Skip to Content
Biotechnology and health

Embryo scoring

Genetic testing on embryos is more sophisticated and accessible than ever—and it’s now being sold as a way to let parents pick their future baby’s best traits.

January 12, 2026
WHOGenomic Prediction, Herasight, Nucleus Genomics, Orchid
WHENNow
A montage collage featuring a microscopic view of embryos layered with a panel of hands raising numeric scores.
VICHHIKA TEP/MIT TECHNOLOGY REVIEW | ADOBE STOCK

Many Americans agree that it’s acceptable to screen embryos for severe genetic diseases. Far fewer say it’s okay to test for characteristics related to a future child’s appearance, behavior, or intelligence. But a few startups are now advertising what they claim is a way to do just that.

Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) has been around in some form since the 1990s. And established tests, such as those for chromosomal abnormalities or single-­gene disorders, are now becoming more accessible—great news for would-be parents at risk of passing on a severe genetic disease. 

In the past few years, startups have begun offering a new form of the technology called PGT-P, or preimplantation genetic testing for polygenic disorders (and, some claim, traits). These are conditions and characteristics that arise out of interactions among hundreds or thousands of genetic variants. The resulting polygenic risk scores offer statistical probabilities that an embryo will develop, say, brown eyes or a high IQ or short stature, presenting potential parents with a way to sift through their “best embryos.”

A company called Genomic Prediction introduced the first clinical application of PGT-P back in 2019. It was followed a few years later by Orchid, which offered a more comprehensive type of sequencing. As they have commercialized, both companies have focused primarily on severe diseases. Then, in 2025, two new competitors—Herasight and Nucleus Genomics—started making bold claims about a wide range of characteristics they could screen for, including intelligence.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, this new kind of testing—which can cost up to $50,000—is incredibly controversial. Some critics warn of eugenics, while others question the clinical utility of these scores. Even proponents acknowledge that they offer probabilities of somewhat limited significance, rather than certainties.

Nevertheless, the practice has grown popular in Silicon Valley, where tech titans like Elon Musk and Peter Thiel have supported companies offering it. Now it’s becoming more widely available to everyone: Today, PGT-P is offered at over 100 fertility clinics in the US. This competition could drive down prices, expand availability, and improve the quality of all PGT services. 

Deep Dive

Biotechnology and health

A woman’s uterus has been kept alive outside the body for the first time

The team behind the feat plan to study uterine disorders and the early stages of pregnancy—and potentially grow a human fetus.

Peptides are everywhere. Here’s what you need to know.

The compounds have exploded in popularity, but big questions about safety and effectiveness are still unresolved.

This scientist rewarmed and studied pieces of his friend’s cryopreserved brain

A gerontologist wanted his preserved brain to be reanimated. Cryopreservation is more likely to be used on organs for transplantation.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.